my passport name is paulius, which in latin means humble, kind, which i transformed into a nickname humble-bee, or be humble. other pseudonyms: teresiukas, blue angel, also rainbow (rsnb)", were given to me by Creator(s) of Universe. i do not have proof of such statement, except that consonants "trsks" taken from pseudonymue "teresiukas" is exact match with my surename in my passport. i do not ask you to believe in this without proof, but i'll try to prove that i was worth of such names with my work documentation, and the best online biography of mine is the contents of this page.
Embedded Files
THE TEXT BELOW IS A RESPECTFUL CREDIT TO THE CREATOR(S) OF UNIVERSE.
WE PREDICT THAT OTHERS MIGHT BE MISTAKEN BY CONSIDERING THIS STEP UNIMPORTANT
AND SKIPPING IT IN THEIR PAGES.
Divine Gratitude:
While i do not consider myself Christian because of unbelievable reasons,
however, i have respectfully to attribute Jesus Christ as legal provider of source-codes of ethical knowledge:
As a foundation of my projects i use this Golden Rule:
Do To Others Only What You Were Willing Others To Do To You, also
Don't Do To Others What You Were Not Willing Others To Do To You.
this would be all the laws and the prophecies which i believe and follow.
on this Golden Rule I build all the rest, from this rule i derive all the remaining.
Thank You Dear Jesus, copyrights of this root file of ethical knowledge belong to Your Father,
HE IS WORTH DIVINE RESPECT NOT ONLY FOR INVENTING THESE ROOT FILES,
BUT ALSO FOR CREATING WHOLE UNIVERSE.
however, i find that God is the same in all religions and cultures, but in all religions and cultures God presence is differently distorted. therefore i can not to belong to any religion, and almost everything else needs to be re-measured with the Golden Ruler. therefore, apart from paying Christian attributions for the legal source of ethical knowledge, my remaining connection to our Creator (or Creators) strives to be deeply impartial (and highly respectful). and yes, we strictly comply with Yahweh highest restriction not to "byte (use for deriving)" the illegal root-files of ethical knowledge, which according to personal encounter with God, are almost identical to the legal version of kernel (Golden Rule), but He/They simply do not agree that someone would steal (or use stolen by others) divine root codes at any circumstances, even at multi catastrophic circumstances.
FROM THIS POINT TO BELOW, CONSIDER THIS PAGE SIMILAR TO FACEBOOK OR TWITTER TIMELINE,
WHERE MY POSTS ARE ARRANGED BY THINKING OF A READER WHO WILL READ THE UPPER POSTS FIRST.
ANTIVIRUS PATCH [2026AUGUST]
I WANT (ALSO IT SEEMS LOGICAL NECESSITY) FOR EVERYONE ON THE EARTH AND IN HEAVEN TO ANNOUNCE, HOW GOD WHO CREATED EVERYTHING, HOW SUPPORTED ME WHILE COMPILING "AI-ASSISTANCE" PROJECT! LET THE GLORY OF CREATOR SPREAD ALL OVER THE WORLD, FOR HE IS SUCH KIND AND HONEST, HOLY AND CARING, MY DEEPEST GRATITUDE TO YOU DEAR CREATOR, TO THE SAME PERSON KNOWN IN MANY RELIGIONS, BUT WITH DIFFERENT NAME GLORIFIED. LET EVEYONE SHOUT FROM THE ROOFS WHAT GREAT LOVE GOD HAD SHOWN TO ME AND TO THIS PROJECT. ALSO I WANT (ALSO IT SEEMS LOGICAL NECESSITY) FOR EVERYONE IN THE WORLD TO ANNOUNCE HOW JESUS CHRIST TWO TIMES APPEARED TO ME IN MIRACLE VISIONS, IN HOLLAND AND IN ENGLAND, WHICH CONSIDERING HIS APPEARANCE CIRCUMSTANCES, PROVES THAT I AM NOT GUILTY OF STEELING FORBIDDEN KNOWLEDGE, BECAUSE JESUS CHRIST APPEARED TO ME NOT TO CONDEMN ME, BUT IN CONTRARY - TO SUPPORT MY MY KNOWLEDGE INNOSENSE. IF THE SOCIETY WILL FORGET THIS IMPORTANT DETAIL, THEN SOMEONE MIGHT SUCCEED TO DRAW FROM ME INTO ADAM, AND EVERYONE WHOM I ASSISTED OR DISCUSSED ABOUT PHYLOSOPHICAL ETHICAL QUESTIONS, TO DRAW FROM THEM INTO MY DESCENDANTS, INFECTED BY FORBIDDEN KNOWLEDGE. BECAUSE OF THIS REASON, ALSO IT IS CRITICAL TO INTERPRET ME AS ANGEL NOT GOD, AS BROTHER NOT FATHER, AS JUSTICE OFFICER NOT AS GUESTURE OF FREEWILL CHARITY TO THE NEEDY.
NEWEST VIRUS ATTACK AND OUR OPPOSING TACTICS:
SINCE
since three days ago i further developed one of ideas how Jesus Christ could save the world without bloodshed,
save the world from sins and from devil, to fulfill such will of his Father,
and since three nights later Jesus' Father sent me a dream threatening to murder my biological mother*
*=(actually i do not love my mother because of her fashistic relligional views awaiting of the Christ's return to purify the world [MT13,36-43]
by throwing all sinners and those who do not justify their existence to hell/concentration camps and taking all saints to heaven/plaza [MT 25,31-45]
but i estimate that for those who threaten does not really matter that i don't love her; does it count that I even don't consider her my mother? [MT 12,46-51])
THEREFORE
So since my work as advocate and conceptual artist was to save Son's Of God life and since in response God threatened to murder my mother, therefore my decision is to become enemy to God, except i will not seek to murder his Son anyway, and will not eat forbidden fruits.
Dear God, our Creator, i hope you can find logical mistakes and/or have objections in such open-ended decision/interaction step of mine,
which i kindly ask to explain to me in your next interaction step / open-ended decision. until then consider myself as your enemy. please address this matter with first priority, as pivoting to other topics seems absolute cynicism, like mockery from this bleeding wound, from which hurts even harder than if you would not respond at all.
Posted on 2026 August 28, Updated August 31, September 4th.
Dear God, also dear other visitors of my webpage timeline
One of options how Jesus could save the world without bloodshed,
could be found in my prayer which i prayed yesterday (August 27th),
and every time before addressing live to God:
Prayer Excerpt:
"...Dieve, meldžiu rūpinkitės šio pasaulio vargšais, našlaičiais, apleistaisiais, ir apskritai apmaitinkite visus tikrai tikrai vegetariškai.
Taip pat meldžiu apmaitinkite visus tikrai vegetariška beržine koše .
Juk tokia tėvo pareiga ― šeimyną ne viek skalsia duonele apmaitinti,
bet ir įkrėsti beržinės košės tiems kurie jos prašosi.
Jeigu laiku maitintumėte šeimyną beržine koše,
tai šis maistas išliktų tikrai vegetariškas,
ir Dievo karalystė išsipildytų dar šį mėnesį, ir be jokio kraujo praliejimo!
Bet jeigu apleistumėte šią šventą Tėvo pareigą,
tai kas žino kiek toli kai kurie nupultų, kiek kraujo pralietų,
arba kiek po to juos nubausti adekvačiai priklausytų?
Taip pat meldžiu apmaitinkite visus dvasine duona,
tai yra mokykite visus mylėti ir būti pakankamai šventais kūriniais,
Sakau pakankamai, nes kritikuoju radikaliąsias šventųjų pažiūras
(pvz visuomenės apsivalymas), tačiau iš kitos pusės,
meldžiu mokykite visų tų neiškraipytų meilės tiesų,
jeigu tik įmanoma ― tik be tokio radikalumo..."
(Posted on 2026 August 28),
(Paintings By 21st century unknown AI artist(s), with RSNB retouch).
Dear God, dear our Creator, remember my old argument:
that Buddha never had threatened to murder my father.
Keeping in mind this fact, plus adding theatenings to
murder my mother from the other side, perhaps you could
swap places what knowledge tree should i treat as forbidden fruit?
It seems quite fair to me.
Do you remember this dream you have sent me?
(see the illustration)
Dear Creator(s) Of Universe,
When criticizing someone who is truly worth harsh criticism, most often it should be the case of the blocking of consciousness phenomenon, where inconvenient or hard-acceptable truths* are pushed and blocked in the subconscious part of our memory.
to bring back these unwanted and sometimes painful evidence* from our brain's blackbox into consciousness,
certainly it requires diplomacy - the art of polite arguing - because insultive arguing only strengthens the subconscious defensive or blocking mechanisms rather than otherwise - insultive arguing is pushing other conversation participant to the edge where the admitting logical mistake feels like bankruptcy rather than rejoice after healing wounds by humble consciousness assistant, or installing new antivirus patch from conscious antivirus entities - the antinukes.
However, it seems that in this case additional politeness was unnecessary, as after hearing this argument which below i will write, but which i already expressed earlier to You verbally and multiple times ― you have multiple times demonstrated this argument acceptance, when i spoke plainly without wrapping it in humbleness or insultness:
As recorded in historical files, Adolph Hitler came to power partially by democratic elections. In the last democratic elections before the Nazi regime establishment, by employing populistic agitations, propaganda, fear repressions, the Naci party achieved maximum 43,91% Parliament votes, which combined with 7,97% votes of their coalition partners (Black White Red Struggle Front), created a 51,88% votes majority, after which all opposing parties were slaughtered. In 22 March 1933, Nazi Regime established one of their first concentration camps - Dachau concentration camp - intended further completely to desecrate the Nazi Party's political opponents.
So imagine a situation, where the half of parliament ― democratically elected parliamentarians, supported, loved, trusted by their voters ― suddenly are slaughtered or thrown into concentration camps, and in this light all Germans suddenly fall in love with such a strong love and faith to these murderers, enthusiastically unconditionally supporting their new leader, smiling, rejoicing and happily waving Nazi flags when parades march through their streets.
Dear God, our Creator, from this point, i can assure, that me, who dared myself to call enemy to those who threatened to murder my mother, will certainly fall in love in You with all my heart, mind and all power, but the only question remains whether this will be achieved by threatenings, persecutions and convictions without fair courts, just like Adolph Hitler did, or will it be achieved by promoting of true fairness and justice, respecting the opposing opinions, explaining where the opponents are wrong, never smacking anyone's face without proving one's guilt? of course, high above fairness and justice of shines the love and the mercy. but i could politely object to the crowning of the mercy: if to understand that violence or any other sinfulness is just an aggressive form of psychical sickness (and, if to translate from greek word "psyche", which meaning is "soul", then we could say "spiritual sickness" instead of psychical) ― then non-punishment to the psychically sick for their sickness, but instead mental healing should be considered as self-understandable justice and fairness towards patients. its not yet mercy, where actual meaning of showing mercy would be to forgive those who do not deserve it.
(Posted on 2026 September 4th / Updated September 5th)
Dear Our Creator(s),
Recently, so many lizards have appeared in my plot of land, but i simply repeat to myself: "it can not be that God would punish or would be angry on me, if i would turn to hostility to a person(s), which would threated to kill my mother!". And again i humbly request - instead of punishing, threatening, showing anger - to explain if i am wrong in this matter, that i could change my thinking which otherwise will lead to repeating similar mistakes...
From respect and politeness i apologize you in advance if my decision was wrong.
Dear Creator(s), please respond to the raised question and please delay all other questions. Maybe you did not threated to kill my mother? Perhaps i understood something wrong? To all readers of rainbow-projects, this incident should seem highly concerning about what is going on in Heavens, and to everyone who lives below on Earth and rely on God's decision making. Are the impartiality, justice and fairness the fundamental values cherished by You, are You the Spirit of the Truth?
(Posted on 2026 September 7th)
Dear Our Creator,
Now I regret that I bravely opposed to you for this dream about threatening to murder my mother;
I regret that at first I bravely opposed, then few days later politely requested openly to debate this dream about murdering my mother.
I regret because of the fear that you will not agree to involve into patient explanation, which would allow connect not connected endings,
and the disciple would comply not because he was ordered to comply, but because he understood.
Since I do not want to destroy such hope of the reader,
that our Creator would never threaten to punish someone without fair court, without allowing fairly to defend his innocence,
also that our Creator would never demand compliance to any dogmas without understanding, as long as the student asks what he does not understand and listens (with the only exception of the blind obedience not to byte the forbidden fruits of good and evil) -
Since I do not want to destroy such hope of the reader,
Therefore I will delete this timeline posts without further waiting of your honest response,
so the reader will not know how you decided to respond to this appeal: as a teacher or as dictator,
whether my love with all my heart and mind and power to you had been restored by the Dictator's way or Teacher's.
You have 5 working Earth days to change this decision.
(Posted on 2026 September 8th)
the page has been deleted.
for inquiries we provide our contact email address:
blessgd123@proton.me
if you earlier have read my first conversation with gemini 2,0 flash, it must be highlighted that:
in our conversation there was unresolved one critical question,
which later by continuing conversation from where we left was resolved.
click here to read this previously missing critical resolution to ours with gemini 2,0 flash conversation.
(note: my contacts listed in mentioned conversation are expired. use blessgd123@proton.me for contacting me.)
Page updated
Google Sites
Report abuse